Though he has often noted the disastrous effect of mass fatherlessness, Dalrymple expresses his discomfort with David Cameron’s official criticism of it, in today’s Independent:
Sentimentality is frequently the reverse side of the coin of cruelty, and this was shown by Mr Cameron’s call in the same article for the stigmatisation of absent fathers. It is one thing for stigma to arise spontaneously from a society’s shared mores, when such stigmatisation may be for good or evil, or some mixture of both. But it is quite another when the head of a government calls for it.
Are we to have a National Stigmatisation Agency, complete with public denunciation ceremonies, to which admission could be charged? This might help to reduce our deficit, but it would be very nasty.
In resorting to the sentimental use of his own happy relations with his father, Mr Cameron was implicitly expressing contempt for the people of his own country, whom he thereby deemed incapable of grasping an argument about the desirability of fatherhood for children without the aid of Hello! magazine-type illustrations. This is to reduce our politics to the intellectual level of American tele-evangelism.
Лазерные картриджи HP. У нас Вы всегда найдете недорогие
[url=http://www.filpan.ru]Недорогие лазерные картриджи hp[/url] для лазерных принтеров и копиров.
Всегда в наличии картридж НР Q2612A , бесплатная доставка картриджей в день обращения 943- 07- 73 тел. Заправка картриджа Samsung, Xerox, HP, Canon, Kyosera, Epson, Oki, Konica – Minolta .
[url=http://www.filpan.ru]Заправка аппарата Samsung SCX 4623 fn[/url]
[url=http://www.filpan.ru]Копиры Canon купить у нас по самой низкой цене.[/url]
[url=http://www.filpan.ru]принтер Canon купить у нас по самой низкой цене.[/url]
I realize that Dalrymple dislikes the fact that Cameron has decided to promote fatherhood by sensationalist means and for personal congratulations but isn’t this where it must start in order for such ideas to take hold again in the wider population?
If by “this” you mean opportunistic politicians, I would disagree. I think it must start in the wider culture before it is ultimately reflected in officialdom.
How would it start in the wider culture if no one influential is promoting it? I’m not trying to begin an argument here but instead I am just genuinely curious to know.