Monthly Archives: August 2011

Behind England’s riots, a violent and entitled generation of British young people

The riots in England seem to be one of the most significant events there in some time, and I’m sure I’m not alone in having been awaiting Dalrymple’s take on it. He argues in today’s New York Daily News that they validate his warnings about British society:
The riots in London and elsewhere in England have confirmed what I long knew and have long preached to my disbelieving but totally unobservant countrymen: that young British people are among the most unpleasant and potentially violent young people in the world. It took determination on the part of my countrymen not to notice it.
….
These riots certainly did not emerge from a cultural vacuum. Many visitors to Britain, including Americans, are surprised and disturbed by how quickly many people in Britain appear to get murderously angry over trifles and direct real and frightening hatred at a person who has offended them in some very slight way. Tempers flare over nothing.
….
So the sheer viciousness and destructiveness of the riots certainly do not surprise me. No one who has seen an English football crowd, and the brutal faces it contains, could be under any illusion as to its potential for violence. At the last match I attended, the police kept the supporters of the two teams apart by almost military maneuvers, and after the match thousands of them frogmarched one set of supporters into their awaiting buses. If they had not done so there is no doubt that widespread fighting, looting and destruction would have occurred. And football tickets are now so expensive that it is no longer the game of the poor. Thus poverty does not explain the quick resort to violence, or the obvious taste for vandalism, of the modern British….This is now the British way of life.
Knowing how many of our readers are English, we’d enjoy reading your comments on these events. And of course, we hope everyone stays safe from the barbarians.
UPDATE: The Daily Mail has actually published a story on Dalrymple’s New York Daily News piece:

Dr Shipman’s review copy

Dalrymple’s July 27th BMJ column recounts his attempt to read Making Sense of the NHS Complaints and Disciplinary Procedures:
It was not a title that normally would have attracted me much, even if, having been published in 1997 (an eternity ago in terms of NHS reorganisation), it were not likely to be already completely obsolete. Moreover, it was written in bullet point prose, and I am afraid even a small number of bullet points causes my mind to glaze over immediately; the effect of 240 such points in the compass of the 111 pages of this book can easily be imagined. As to numbered paragraphs, further subdivided, I have not counted them. A few flow charts completed the anaesthetising effect.
The enumerated desiderata of a complaints system were enough to induce a state of suspended animation in my brain: responsiveness, quality enhancement, cost effectiveness, accessibility, impartiality, simplicity, speed, confidentiality, and accountability. One could just hear the droning voice in a stuffy lecture theatre in one’s mind’s ear: blah, blah, blah. The proliferation of this well meaning and high minded cliché provoked a need for subversion, and to escape from the instantaneous boredom I began to imagine the advantages of a system that was unresponsive, expensive, ineffective, slow, complex, incomprehensible, and completely unaccountable.

Murder most horrid

In the July 20th British Medical Journal, Dalrymple again expresses his love of murder mysteries.
The Dying of the Light, by Michael Dibdin (1947–2007), is set in an old people’s home called Eventide Lodge, which was once a country house. The previous owner left it to her son and daughter—the former suave, cynical, and cruel; the latter fat, boorish, and brutal—on condition that they continue to provide a home for the residents already there. Brother and sister therefore have a motive to kill all of the residents, and in Dr Morel they have a complaisant visiting general practitioner who will cover up for anything that they do…
Nevertheless, Dr Morel insists on sending one of the residents, Dorothy Davenport, to hospital because she has cancer. The brother is worried lest Dorothy reveal what goes on in the home to hospital staff, to which Dr Morel replies, “Don’t fret. She’ll be out of it on pain control most of the time, plus with the staffing levels these days no one has the time to stand around nattering.”
And this was written in the good old days: that is to say, 1993.
The piece ends on an interesting autobiographical note:

The only murder I ever uncovered was of a murder made to look like a suicide.

A mule to La Estrella

Going forward we will be posting more excerpts of Dalrymple’s books, as well as older essays. In the next few weeks this will take the form of several passages from the 1990 book Sweet Waist of America, recounting the seven months he spent in Central America during Guatemala’s brutal civil war. In this excerpt (pps. 186-188), Dalrymple travels into the Guatemalan countryside via foot and mule.
Mike Shawcross had only two or three days to spare, and so we set out to see something of the nearby villages. We had a guide and two mules and a pony, though it was not clear whether these latter made our journey any the easier. Unused to riding, at the end of several hours in the saddle my thighs ached and my buttocks felt like those of a masochist after a good night out. But it was worth the travail a hundred times over, for the steep and muddy mule tracks over which the beasts fastidiously picked their way, at their own pace and no other, passed through scenes of astonishing loveliness, always to the accompaniment of the sound of running water. The dark green coffee bushes on the more accessible slopes were hung with crimson berries. From the sides of ravines grew huge and noble trees, ceibas with hundred foot trunks that suddenly opened up into broad canopies of foliage. All around were wild dahlias, tall as a man standing on another man’s shoulders, bearing mauve flowers; and white trumpet lilies, perfect in form, that seemed to call for the loving work of a Victorian flower painter to capture them on the page of an exquisite volume. Vistas opened up of green mountains against blue sky. I drew my mule up sharply just so that I could drink with my eyes.
….
And we continued, too, until we reached a mountain meadow of great size and lushness, where horses and cattle grazed. At the far end of the meadow ran a river, of limpid water crushed into foam by rocks. On the banks of the river hosts of brilliant butterflies played in the sun, as if for joy of living. If ever there were an earthly paradise, I thought, this was it. 
Across the river was slung a suspension bridge of wire and wooden slats. Many of the slats were broken or missing, the wire was worn and looked as though it might snap at any moment. When one stepped on to the bridge, it began to oscillate with considerable violence, like a dog shaking off water. To reach our destination, the village of La Estrella (the Star), we had to cross the river, but the animals clearly could not use the bridge and we sent them across what we mistakenly thought was a ford. But the water was deep and the current strong, and within a couple of minutes the terrified animals were struggling for their lives. One of them would neither go forward nor return, and when at last he tried to go up river, it was into deeper water still. His eyes stared wildly, as in a painting by Gericault, and we thought we had lost him, but, with what seemed his very last strength, he managed to drag himself ashore. I watched the drama from the bridge, to the centre of which I had gone to conquer my fear, and so absorbing was the drama that I did not notice until it was over that the bridge swung with almost every breath I took. 
So we did not reach La Estrella, but it happened that we met a few men from there on their way to La Perla. We sat by the riverside and talked to them. Oh yes, they had known disaster: the army had attacked their village, burned their houses, killed scores of people. 
They had gone to live in the mountains until it was safe to return. They were no longer afraid of the army, but before . . . We heard similar stories in other villages. One of them had once consisted of more than 600 households but now there were only 97. It was true that people were still coming down from the mountains, but it would never return to its former size. 
Whenever I heard these stories, what struck me was the great dignity with which they were told. The people were neither self­-pitying, nor asking for pity. Neither were they thirsting for revenge, at least to all outward appearances. Yet they were not apathetic either: there was something about them more positive than that, as though they were in possession of a philosophy that put them above the world of dreadful appearances. Perhaps it was the old Mayan idea that all that happens goes in cycles. At any rate, something must have given them the strength, the desire, to go on living, the ability still to laugh after having witnessed the scenes that their laconic descriptions of events implied. Still they wanted children. And they even took part in village football matches with enthusiasm. I remembered my rage at life when a telephone number I had rung was busy, and was ashamed.
Copyright 1990 Anthony Daniels. Reprinted with permission.

Little Emperors

The new National Review includes this piece on the anti-democratic nature of the Eurocracy:
Being a member of the European political class means never having to say you are wrong — much less, of course, having to say you are sorry. As a member of this self-perpetuating magic circle, you don’t have to learn from experience, consider the evidence, apply logic, or worry about the consequences. There are always expenses at the end of the tunnel. 
Like the white man who speaks with forked tongue, or the Muslim permitted to use taqqiya to mislead the infidel, the Eurocrat never quite means what he says or says what he means. Indeed, what he says is compatible with almost anything, and this quality of emptying definite meaning from grammatically formed sentences full of polysyllables has been a characteristic from the very inception of what is now the European Union. 
This part is just plain fun:

Herman van Rompuy, the Belgian “president” of Europe whose electoral record makes Stalin’s positively shine (Stalin received too many votes, van Rompuy none at all), is Monnet’s spiritual heir, if one can apply such a term to such men. In a speech last November, van Rompuy — grey of face, grey of suit, grey of speech, and grey of thought — declared national sovereignty in Europe dead, not appearing to notice that his position was approximately that of a murderer who stands over his victim’s corpse muttering, “He’s gone, he’s gone!”

Besides being available to NR subscribers, you may also purchase the actual magazine at your local newsstand, of course.