A brief summary can not do justice to Dalrymple’s new article in First Things. It is a review of the two new books by the Hitchens brothers, Christopher’s Hitch-22 and Peter’s The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith. As the names imply, these are personal memoirs outlining the philosophies of the two men, and unsuprisingly to his loyal readers, Dalrymple the atheist actually finds Peter’s view more appealing. But the review is mostly an outline of the problems Dalrymple finds in Christopher’s work and character, and for anyone familiar with Christopher Hitchens, Dalrymple’s criticism seems both devastatingly accurate and highly entertaining. I could quote at length, but I wouldn’t know where to stop.
Blog categories
Dalrymple’s Essays
- BMJ (Dalrymple)
- BMJ (Daniels)
- City Journal
- Daily Mail
- First Things
- Law & Liberty
- Manhattan Institute
- New Criterion (Dalrymple)
- New Criterion (Daniels)
- New English Review
- New Statesman
- New York Post
- PJ Media
- Quadrant
- Salisbury Review
- Second Opinion
- Taki's Magazine
- The American Conservative
- The Critic
- The Epoch Times
- The European Conservative
- The Oldie
- The Spectator
- The Telegraph
Dalrymple’s Books
- These Spindrift Pages
- The Wheelchair and Other Stories
- Ramses: A Memoir
- Neither Trumpets nor Violins
- Midnight Maxims
- Saving the Planet and Other Stories
- Around the World in the Cinemas of Paris
- Embargo and Other Stories
- In Praise of Folly
- False Positive
- Illness as Inspiration
- The Terror of Existence
- Grief and Other Stories
- The Proper Procedure and Other Stories
- The Knife Went In
- Nothing But Wickedness
- Migration
- Good and Evil in the Garden of Art
- A Pinch of Salt
- Out Into the Beautiful World
- Admirable Evasions
- Threats of Pain and Ruin
- The Pleasure of Thinking
- Farewell Fear
- The Policeman & the Brothel
- Anything Goes
- Mr Clarke's Modest Proposal
- Litter: How Other People's Rubbish Shapes Our Life
- The Examined Life
- Spoilt Rotten
- The New Vichy Syndrome
- Second Opinion
- Profeten en Charlatans
- Not With a Bang But a Whimper
- In Praise of Prejudice
- Romancing Opiates
- Our Culture, What's Left of It
- Life at the Bottom
- An Intelligent Person's Guide to Medicine
- Mass Listeria
- If Symptoms Still Persist
- So Little Done
- If Symptoms Persist
- Monrovia, Mon Amour
- The Wilder Shores of Marx
- Sweet Waist of America
- Filosofa's Republic
- Zanzibar to Timbuktu
- Fool or Physician
- Coups and Cocaine
Recent Comments
- Arman V on Catching a Cloud
- Andrew S on Catching a Cloud
- Arman V on Catching a Cloud
- David Seri on An Interesting Life
- Mick Sherman on Blanquette de Bard
- Arman V on An Interesting Life
- Ed on ‘Positive’ Discrimination’s Little Mentioned Obverse
- Iwona Hunter on Theodore Dalrymple on Britain’s Woke Police and Oxford Street Chaos
- Bill Murphy on Service Without a Smile
- Kevin Morrison on Theodore Dalrymple on Britain’s Woke Police and Oxford Street Chaos
The kind of “religion” promoted by Theodore,
Hitchens, FT, and indeed right-wing religionists all over the world, is the most superficial and factional and most often dim-minded and perverse expressions of ancient national and power seeking cultism, and in effect a form of collective psychosis.
At last, and inevitably the ancient exoteric rulerships have failed, and “official” exoteric Christianity, along with all the other “great world religions” of worldly “religion”-power, is now reduced to all the impenetrable illusions and decadent exercises that everywhere characterize previously privileged aristocracies in their decline from worldly power. Now exoteric Christianity is reduced to a chaos of competing corporate cults and Barnumesque propagandists that “rule” nothing more than the chaotic herds of self-deluded “religion”-consumers.
Therefore, the myth of the “cultural superiority” of “official” Christianity, and merely exoteric “religions”, has now come full circle. The “eligious” mythologies of “world-religions” are not only now waging global warfare with one another, like so many psychotic inmates of asylums for the mad, each confronting the other with exclusive claims of personal absoluteness, but the public masses of religion-bound people–who, all over the world, for even thousands , have been controlled in body and mind by ancient institutions of “religiously” propagandized worldly-power–are now in a globalized state of grossly bound “religious” delusion and social psychosis.
Mr Dalrymple is not a right-wing religionist; in fact, if you read more of his writing you would discover that he is an atheist, and has been since a moment of philosophical cogitation at the tender age of 14. Superficiality was condemned by both Christ and the Church and I am not aware of anything having changed on that score; most churches go through rituals and produce cultural, architectural and ecclesiological artifacts out of respect for God and to His glory ,making use of the skills they have been given. Some people adopt the pretense of religion for worldly glory, but such worldliness is by no means dominant among professed Christians. Christians on the earth are not supposed to rule as a condition of their faith- they are supposed to serve (God and others.) If a believer can do good by taking control of a country or empire as often happened during the medieval and Renaissance period, this is part of that plan. I cannot discern the precise motives of individuals; man has not been given that power.
You use the word “exoteric” several times. Is this intended to imply there is a deeper, “esoteric” transcendental truth in the Christian faith and you believe the churches as they stand are lacking affinity with such a truth?